The AI-Ready Non-Profit Back Office · Part 01
TERN: Building the Non-Profit Back-Office Infrastructure the Sector Never Had
Twenty years of working inside non-profits left me watching extraordinarily capable organisations spend their best operational energy fighting infrastructure that was never designed for them. TERN is our answer to that — a non-profit back-office integration framework built from lived experience. Here's what we're building, why it doesn't exist yet, and how you can help shape it.
I've spent twenty years watching extraordinarily capable organisations — mission-driven, well-led, deeply committed to their work — spend their best operational energy wrestling with infrastructure that was never designed for them. Donation data that reconciles differently on every side of the ledger. Restricted funds governed by spreadsheets and good intentions. Grant reports rebuilt from scratch each cycle because the data lives in five different places. Budgets that exist as email attachments until the annual process starts, at which point they become email attachments again.
The sector has been excluded from purpose-built infrastructure for so long that the absence has been normalised as the default. TERN is our direct answer to that.
What TERN Is — and What It Isn't
Define the thing before you build it.
Chapter 01 of 04
Skip chapter introTERN is PF TECH's non-profit back-office integration framework. It is being built as an intelligent, agent-based system — domain-specific capabilities surfaced through a chat interface, with embedded components and popouts where the workflow requires them. The architecture will follow wherever the technology lands. What will not change is the goal: a coherent, sovereign back-office ecosystem built specifically for the charitable sector.
I want to be direct about something: TERN is in active development. We do not have a finished product. We do not have a public user base. We have twenty years of operational knowledge, a clear engineering direction, a growing portfolio of Strategic Partner organisations co-creating the roadmap with us, and a conviction that the sector deserves purpose-built infrastructure that no general-purpose platform will ever prioritise building.
What we have is the proof of concept — and the proof is in the numbers.
The 83% reduction shown above is not a TERN result. It is what happened when I built an interim low-code automation for gift processing at one of our partner organisations — moving from a fully manual process to a Power Automate workflow. Eighty-three percent reduction in monthly processing time, from roughly 24 hours to under 4 hours, for 50 to 75 donations per month. The workflow was brittle. It required manual maintenance. It was not scalable. But the reduction in processing time was real and immediate, and it told us something important: the problem is simple. It has just gone unsolved.
The problem is simple. It has just gone unsolved.
— From the 83% field result, 2025
TERN's gift processing and reconciliation capability will take that interim result toward near-zero. Automated sync from payment processor to CRM to QuickBooks Online, coded as fund-restricted receipts with internal controls baked in at the architecture level.
The sector-specific domain knowledge layered into every TERN workflow — two decades of audits, grant reconciliations, fund management, and governance practice.
The Three Capabilities We're Building
Direct translations of problems already solved inside real organisations.
Chapter 02 of 04
Skip chapter introTERN is being developed around three core capabilities that address the most persistent operational failures I have seen repeat themselves across every non-profit I've worked with. Each capability is a direct translation of something I have already built manually or with low-code tools inside real organisations.
Gift Processing & Reconciliation
Addresses the most painful data fragmentation in the sector: the same donation described differently by the payment processor, the donor database, and the accounting system. Every non-profit using a fundraising platform and an accounting system has this problem. TERN automates the sync, enforces proper fund restriction coding, and builds the audit trail that funders increasingly require — without any data passing through an AI model without de-identification first.
Collaborative Budgeting
Addresses the annual process that somehow still runs on spreadsheets passed around by email. We are currently building a conversational budget agent that engages the right stakeholders at the right moments: the Executive Director for strategic context, the Finance Committee Chair for governance priorities, the fundraising director for revenue targets, department heads for operating expenses, HR for staffing projections. The agent consolidates inputs, surfaces conflicts, and — once the designated financial authority approves — publishes the final budget directly to QuickBooks Online. It is an agent that understands non-profit budget structures, fund accounting logic, and the governance relationships that determine how decisions get made in a charitable organisation.
Fund & Grant Management
Addresses the single greatest source of compliance anxiety for non-profit finance teams: restricted funds, grant agreements, and the gap between what development committed and what finance is accountable for. Grant compliance tracking, labour allocation to programs, multi-funder reporting — all governed by a verifiable source of truth rather than a binder someone updates quarterly. The budgeting capability and the fund management capability are designed to be deeply integrated: once a budget is published to QBO, grant agreements are reviewed against it for compliance analysis and reporting.
Architecture Principles That Cannot Be Compromised
Designed by someone who has lived inside the compliance anxiety these concerns create.
Chapter 03 of 04
Skip chapter introThe sector's relationship with technology is complicated by an entirely legitimate set of concerns. Donor data. Service user data. Volunteer records. These are sensitive, often legally protected, and increasingly scrutinized by funders, auditors, and regulators operating under PIPEDA and provincial privacy frameworks.
TERN's architecture was designed by someone who has lived inside the compliance anxiety these concerns create. Every principle below is non-negotiable.
Why We're Building This in Public
Built with the sector, alongside the people who run it.
Chapter 04 of 04
Skip chapter introThere is a deliberate choice embedded in how we're approaching TERN's development: we are building it with the sector, alongside the people who run it.
Strategic Partners
Our Strategic Partners — a boutique portfolio of Canadian non-profits working with us in an embedded operational capacity — are co-authors of the system. Their real operational challenges surface what is worth building. Their workflows validate what we have built. Their results become the proof points that demonstrate the approach.
Mission Multiplier Program
The Mission Multiplier Program extends this to practitioners. MMP participants are the first outside audience to access TERN capabilities as they become available — part testing community, part learning cohort, part product development partner. If you are a finance professional or executive leader in the sector who wants to understand where this technology is going and have a voice in shaping it, the MMP is the fastest path in.
Co-Creation Lab
And if your organisation has a specific operational problem that you believe is worth building a solution for — something that doesn't fit the standard product roadmap but would transform how you operate — the Co-Creation Lab is how we work together on bespoke development.
Follow the build
Monthly notes from inside the work
What we're building next, what the field is telling us, what's working across the cohort. Unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing you join the PF TECH mailing list to receive Mission Multiplied posts. Monthly cadence. Unsubscribe anytime from any email. See our privacy policy at read.purposeforwardtech.com/privacy for how we handle your data.
Friction Point Submission
The lowest-barrier option of all: tell us what is breaking. We have a friction point submission form for exactly this purpose. No cost, no commitment. Just tell us where your operations are failing, and we will use that signal to inform what we build next.
We are building this with the sector, alongside the people who run it. And we would genuinely like your help making it better.
Help build what the sector needs
Join the Mission Multiplier Program to be first in line as capabilities launch. Bring a specific problem to the Co-Creation Lab for bespoke development. Or simply tell us where your operations are breaking — friction point submissions are free, no commitment required.
How did this land?
About the author
Greg Zatulovsky
Founder & CEO, PF TECH
Greg founded PF TECH to multiply the operational capacity of purpose-driven organizations. CPA with fifteen-plus years in non-profit finance, operations, and technology. Writes from inside the work — practitioner voice, not pitch deck.
More reading
Foundations First
The principle · Building Blocks · 01
AI in your non-profit is organisational design, in a vocabulary the sector already speaks — and the building blocks are smaller than the framing suggests.
What I've Built and What I've Broken
The practice · Building Blocks · 02
Close to a year exploring, six months serious. Sixteen agents and counting, one hundred dollars a month, three cents per image. The architecture, the sequencing, the layered controls — and the four things that broke before the controls were in place.
The Function the Sector Was Never Going to Hire
What internal audit could look like if it stopped looking like internal audit
The big four firms are naming the future of internal audit — continuous, agentic, real-time. They're selling it to the F500. The grassroots social purpose sector was never in that audience and was never going to be. Here's what the function looks like built into the workflow itself.